Although Mercury and Venus for example do not have moons, they do exert a small pull on one another, and on the other planets of the solar system. As a result, the planets follow paths that are subtly different than they would be without this perturbing effect.
Although the mathematics is a bit more difficult, and the uncertainties are greater, astronomers can use these small deviations to determine how massive the moonless planets are. Finally, what about those objects such as asteroids, whose masses are so small that they do not measurably perturb the orbits of the other planets?
Until recent years, the masses of such objects were simply estimates, based upon the apparent diameters and assumptions about the possible mineral makeup of those bodies.
Now, however, several asteroids have been or soon will be visited by spacecraft. Just like a natural moon, a spacecraft flying by an asteroid has its path bent by an amount controlled by the mass of the asteroid.
This "bending" is measured by careful tracking and Doppler radio measurement from Earth. Recently, the NEAR spacecraft flew by the asteroid Mathilde, determining for the first time its actual mass. It turned out to be considerably lighter and more "frothy" in structure than had been expected, a fact that is challenging planetary scientists for an explanation.
Originally published on March 16, Make sure your distance measurement is in meters and your time measurement is in seconds in order for the units to cancel correctly.
The mass of the Sun is: x 10 kg. Return to solving this using Newton's law of universal gravitation. He miscalculated because his numbers for the Earth-sun distance relied on inaccurate measurements of the sun's parallax , which is the apparent shift of the sun in the sky as observed at different points in Earth's orbit.
Researchers also found that he made an error in transcribing numbers when writing new editions of "Principia," his collection of texts that describe mathematical and physical concepts. Today, instead of using parallax, astronomers can accurately measure distances between solar system objects with radar.
By measuring the time it takes for a satellite's radar signal to bounce back from another planet, astronomers can determine the distance to that planet. But because the sun doesn't have a solid surface , radar signals don't bounce back.
So, to measure the Earth-sun distance, astronomers first must measure distances to another object, such as Venus. Then, by triangulation, they can calculate the distance to the sun.
We then determine the period—how long the stars take to go through an orbital cycle—from the velocity curve. Knowing how fast the stars are moving and how long they take to go around tells us the circumference of the orbit and, hence, the separation of the stars in kilometers or astronomical units.
Of course, knowing the sum of the masses is not as useful as knowing the mass of each star separately. But the relative orbital speeds of the two stars can tell us how much of the total mass each star has.
As we saw in our seesaw analogy, the more massive star is closer to the center of mass and therefore has a smaller orbit. Therefore, it moves more slowly to get around in the same time compared to the more distant, lower-mass star. If we sort out the speeds relative to each other, we can sort out the masses relative to each other. In practice, we also need to know how the binary system is oriented in the sky to our line of sight, but if we do, and the just-described steps are carried out carefully, the result is a calculation of the masses of each of the two stars in the system.
To summarize, a good measurement of the motion of two stars around a common center of mass, combined with the laws of gravity, allows us to determine the masses of stars in such systems.
These mass measurements are absolutely crucial to developing a theory of how stars evolve. One of the best things about this method is that it is independent of the location of the binary system. It works as well for stars light-years away from us as for those in our immediate neighborhood. In this case, the two stars, the one we usually call Sirius and its very faint companion, are separated by about 20 AU and have an orbital period of about 50 years. If we place these values in the formula we would have.
Therefore, the sum of masses of the two stars in the Sirius binary system is 3. In order to determine the individual mass of each star, we would need the velocities of the two stars and the orientation of the orbit relative to our line of sight.
Figure 5. Brown Dwarfs in Orion: These images, taken with the Hubble Space Telescope, show the region surrounding the Trapezium star cluster inside the star-forming region called the Orion Nebula. The faintest objects in this image are brown dwarfs with masses between 13 and 80 times the mass of Jupiter. Schneider, E.
Young, G. Rieke, A. Cotera, H. Chen, M. Rieke, R. Thompson Steward Observatory. How large can the mass of a star be? Stars more massive than the Sun are rare. None of the stars within 30 light-years of the Sun has a mass greater than four times that of the Sun. Searches at large distances from the Sun have led to the discovery of a few stars with masses up to about times that of the Sun, and a handful of stars a few out of several billion may have masses as large as solar masses.
However, most stars have less mass than the Sun. Such objects are intermediate in mass between stars and planets and have been given the name brown dwarfs Figure 5. Brown dwarfs are similar to Jupiter in radius but have masses from approximately 13 to 80 times larger than the mass of Jupiter.
0コメント